The recent shooting spree by a jawan from the paramilitary force for not being granted leave underlines the need for introspection. Leave to an individual from the armed forces, including the paramilitary forces posted on the border or in outlying areas, as also on board naval vessels, is more important than the quality of food they are given.
Whilst in command of a naval warship, a sailor was marched up to my desk as a "defaulter.” He had left the ship without leave. The sailor had taken short leave two months earlier but had once again requested a few days off just prior to the ship’s sailing for a major exercise. As he was the only qualified radar operator on board, his presence during the exercise was essential and his leave was denied by the departmental officer.
The sailor explained that he had been preparing for his BA exams for over a year, to improve his prospects for employment after leaving the service. He had earlier taken leave to appear in the BA Part I and Part II papers in his hometown. However, owing to unavoidable circumstances the Part II paper was postponed and he reported back on board the ship without appearing for it. A few days later he received intimation of the new date for the BA, Part II exam which unfortunately coincided with the ship’s operational program. If he missed this opportunity he would lose a full year.
Unfortunately, the priorities of the leave granting officer and those of the sailor were at variance. For both it was a Hobson’s choice.
After hearing the case I, unhesitatingly wrote in the register: "Case dismissed. The sailor’s absence to be regularized.” Soon thereafter, I issued standing instructions that departmental officers may approve the leave of all sailors in their departments but refusal of leave will be the captain’s prerogative.
A request for leave should not be taken lightly. Cmde MEDIOMA BHADA (Retd)
mrbhada@gmail.com